<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Perceptual-Metrics on DRM HSE</title><link>https://www.drmhse.com/tags/perceptual-metrics/</link><description>Recent content in Perceptual-Metrics on DRM HSE</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 15:18:53 +0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.drmhse.com/tags/perceptual-metrics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A Tiny Speech Judge That Agrees With My Ears</title><link>https://www.drmhse.com/posts/a-tiny-speech-judge-that-agrees-with-my-ears/</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 15:00:00 +0300</pubDate><guid>https://www.drmhse.com/posts/a-tiny-speech-judge-that-agrees-with-my-ears/</guid><description>&lt;p>I am building a very small text-to-speech model, whose decoder (the part that makes the sound) has about
1.75 million parameters, and I want it to sound as good as
&lt;a href="https://huggingface.co/hexgrad/Kokoro-82M"target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="external-link">Kokoro-82M&lt;svg class="inline-block w-3 h-3 ml-0.5 align-baseline" fill="none" stroke="currentColor" viewBox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" aria-hidden="true">
 &lt;path stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M10 6H6a2 2 0 00-2 2v10a2 2 0 002 2h10a2 2 0 002-2v-4M14 4h6m0 0v6m0-6L10 14">&lt;/path>
 &lt;/svg>
&lt;/a> and eventually better. Improving it means trying
many variants and keeping the ones that sound better. The bottleneck is the word &lt;em>sound&lt;/em>. Every candidate
has to be listened to, the next training run waits on each listening round, and the automatic metrics I
tried kept disagreeing with my ears.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>